sause's result (2019/02/12 05:07:06)

LuxMark version: 
3.1
OS: 
Linux
Benchmark mode: 
OpenCL
Benchmark sub-mode: 
GPU
Scene: 
LuxBall HDR
Score: 
242,842
Note: 
OpenCL device count: 
12
Platform namePlatform versionSymbolic device nameDevice nameDevice typeUnitsClockVector widthMax. global mem.Local mem.Constant mem.
NVIDIA CorporationOpenCL 1.2 CUDA 9.2.210GeForce GTX 1070 [15 units @ 1784MHz]GeForce GTX 1070GPU151,784 MHz18,314,432 Kbytes48 Kbytes64 Kbytes
NVIDIA CorporationOpenCL 1.2 CUDA 9.2.210GeForce GTX 1070 [15 units @ 1683MHz]GeForce GTX 1070GPU151,683 MHz18,314,432 Kbytes48 Kbytes64 Kbytes
NVIDIA CorporationOpenCL 1.2 CUDA 9.2.210GeForce GTX 1070 [15 units @ 1784MHz]GeForce GTX 1070GPU151,784 MHz18,314,432 Kbytes48 Kbytes64 Kbytes
NVIDIA CorporationOpenCL 1.2 CUDA 9.2.210GeForce GTX 1070 [15 units @ 1708MHz]GeForce GTX 1070GPU151,708 MHz18,314,432 Kbytes48 Kbytes64 Kbytes
NVIDIA CorporationOpenCL 1.2 CUDA 9.2.210GeForce GTX 1070 [15 units @ 1708MHz]GeForce GTX 1070GPU151,708 MHz18,314,432 Kbytes48 Kbytes64 Kbytes
NVIDIA CorporationOpenCL 1.2 CUDA 9.2.210GeForce GTX 1070 [15 units @ 1784MHz]GeForce GTX 1070GPU151,784 MHz18,314,432 Kbytes48 Kbytes64 Kbytes
NVIDIA CorporationOpenCL 1.2 CUDA 9.2.210GeForce GTX 1070 [15 units @ 1708MHz]GeForce GTX 1070GPU151,708 MHz18,314,432 Kbytes48 Kbytes64 Kbytes
NVIDIA CorporationOpenCL 1.2 CUDA 9.2.210GeForce GTX 1070 [15 units @ 1784MHz]GeForce GTX 1070GPU151,784 MHz18,314,432 Kbytes48 Kbytes64 Kbytes
NVIDIA CorporationOpenCL 1.2 CUDA 9.2.210GeForce GTX 1070 [15 units @ 1784MHz]GeForce GTX 1070GPU151,784 MHz18,314,432 Kbytes48 Kbytes64 Kbytes
NVIDIA CorporationOpenCL 1.2 CUDA 9.2.210GeForce GTX 1070 [15 units @ 1784MHz]GeForce GTX 1070GPU151,784 MHz18,314,432 Kbytes48 Kbytes64 Kbytes
NVIDIA CorporationOpenCL 1.2 CUDA 9.2.210GeForce GTX 1070 [15 units @ 1708MHz]GeForce GTX 1070GPU151,708 MHz18,314,432 Kbytes48 Kbytes64 Kbytes
NVIDIA CorporationOpenCL 1.2 CUDA 9.2.210GeForce GTX 1070 [15 units @ 1784MHz]GeForce GTX 1070GPU151,784 MHz18,314,432 Kbytes48 Kbytes64 Kbytes
Does it look like a legit result ?: 
0
No votes yet
Is it an interesting result ?: 
0
No votes yet